Why diUndertaker the worst decision after Undertaker VS Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania 30?
Undertaker is considered the WWE legend that has supported the company for over 20 years. He is one of the best WWE athletes of all time and the man behind the success of the WWE WrestleMania Central Event.
He had a great WWE career and a remarkable record, he was a seven-time world champion and won the WrestleMania series 21-1.
The biggest concern for WrestleMania is the breakthrough that Brock Lesnar made at WrestleMania 30. This is his first defeat at WrestleMania, which defeated him in an unbeaten upset.
Why is this fight a WWE decision?
Undertaker has a legacy in WWE and remained unbeaten at WrestleMania until the third year. Brock Lesnar came out victorious when they met, but the question is not what kind of fight is needed. The undertaker is already on the way to retirement, and this is a severe blow to his retirement.
The Undertaker should remain undefeated
He continued his career with passion and determination and did not deceive anyone. As mentioned above, they set the standards for WrestleMania, so defeat in this highly electrifying event is unjustified.
Why is that the worst decision?
The WWE has never made the fight between Brock Lesnar and Undertaker in half. After his defeat, the fans were devastated, and that does not mean that they fought after their defeat at WrestleMania. That it may not be the end that a WWE fan wants, he should retire after the wave ends, but WWE has pushed it further, and it was a bad idea for the industry.